A while back I wrote some articles on steering options:   
              
              Well, recently I had occasion to further explore some of the options I had  passed lightly over. 
              Steering Math Again 
              It occurred to me that some of the discussion of mechanical  advantage in cable steering systems might have been less than intuitive. I  think I have a better way. We can represent these mechanical advantages in  terms of equivalent tiller length.  Sailors seem to have an intuitive understanding of how long a tiller should be  to control a given boat and rudder. Here’s an equation (cm or inches are fine,  just be consistent): 
              Tiller length = (Hand  Travel / 2) / .57735 
              The only other information we need to know is how far we  move our hand to cover the full rudder travel (30 degrees to each side). This  is simple with a stick, since it’s a vertical tiller. With a wheel you multiply  the circumference where you hold it by the number of turns. Everything else is  transparently included in this comparison.  
              On my Bolger light schooner, the wheel covers 17.5 feet of  side travel – a tiller about 15 feet long!! It is easy to see that this is more  than twice the leverage of the six foot tiller we might expect on such a boat.  But that six foot tiller would require almost seven feet of side travel –  inconvenient. Worse, I’ve read that in strong winds a 6’ tiller can still pull pretty hard.  
              So now can also see why a handle tied to the steering line  about pulled my arm off – the equivalent tiller length is a meager 19”. A Norse  tiller could get us to about the same and dual monkey sticks could give us  around 29” – still not enough. The light schooner has a really big rudder with  no balance area at all, so it’s hard to put a long enough tiller on one of  these boats without resorting to a wheel. 
              Speaking of wheels… 
              Wheels for Sailboats 
              In sailboats and slowish powerboats most of us seem to want a  traditional-looking open-spoked “ship’s wheel”. This is probably fine in a  powerboat, though a monkey stick does the same job with less gear (more on that  below).  
              In a small sailboat, however, I have come to hate  open-spoked wheels. Those spokes excel at grabbing lines and winding them  around the shaft, usually just when you really don’t want them to. It took a  while to hammer this through my thick skull, but there’s a reason that  destroyer-style wheels have mostly displaced the old style. The outer rim of  the destroyer wheel sheds lines, which is a big deal on a small sailboat. 
              Destroyer wheels are available pretty cheaply on Ebay, but these  need a 3/4” tapered shaft with a keyway. A real taper cannot be faked with low  tech tools – you need a lathe and the ability to use it. I was tempted to file  an approximate taper on some stainless rod, then epoxy the wheel on and lock it  in place with a pin through hub and shaft. But I decided that my low-tech  flange mounting system is stronger and simpler. Besides, a wood wheel feels  good in the hand.  
              Building a decent wooden wheel is a bit daunting, but I  think I’ve simplified it Ages ago in my article on metalwork I mentioned the  shaving horse I built to make a banjo. Well, here’s the third banjo. (It’s the same kind of addiction as boatbuilding, so  don’t get started.)  
                    
              This seems thoroughly off-topic, but it’s not. Notice how  the oak is joined in six “pie slice” segments? Those are simple rubbed-in (no  clamping) joints with TiteBond III. The wood is cut to 30-degree miters so it  fits together in a hexagon pattern. After gluing it is cut to shape and planed  or sanded flat. Join two layers of this with offset joints and you have a  pretty strong assembly. Add dowels and it’s really strong. Because I’d built these round banjo parts that way, the technique leapt  to mind for steering wheel parts.  
                
              The hub and rim are two layers of ¾” red oak scrap, and the  spokes are 7/8” dowel rod. If you can cut an accurate 30 degree miter, the joints are pretty easy. If not,  you’ll be doing some sanding to fit like I did. Here are the layers of the rim  being glued up, then the excess being cut away.  
                  
              I rounded the edges of the rim with a ½” roundover bit on  the router, then I glued the spokes in with thickened epoxy. Since my doweling  was noticeably smaller than my nearest drill bit, I couldn’t make it fit tight  enough for Titebond III. It was a giant mess getting the parts tapped into  place with gobs of epoxy everywhere, but I couldn’t think of a neater way to do  it. Make sure you wipe up all the squeeze-out or you’ll be stuck sanding it! It  helps to scrape off any you missed when it’s at the rubbery stage of cure. 
              Once everything was glued in place, I bored through the hub  and rim at each spoke to glue in a dowel, locking the spokes in place. I also  dowelled the layers together between spokes. It might not be necessary, but I  doubt it hurts either. I also think the dowels also look nice too when  finished, distracting from the router errors I didn’t want to bother sanding  out.  
                  
              With all the dowels cut flush and everything sanded, all it  needed was finish. I like Thompson’s Water Seal these days, as it goes on easy  and cures fast. I guess time will tell if it’s really any good. After that it  was ready to bolt to the flange.  
                  
              The copper plate is something I made by slitting and flattening  a scrap of plumping pipe, then polishing it up and hammer dressing it. It is  there to spread the load of the bolt heads and hide my imperfect center joint.  I tried using painted steel first, but it just didn’t look right with oak. If  you’re going to try this hammer dressing thing, make sure you have some crocus  cloth or a buffer to smooth the metal and the hammer’s ball before you start  denting it. 
              I suppose this wheel looks a bit out of place on a schooner,  maybe more like it should be on a 1920s style runabout. But it’s better than  gleaming stainless steel. Actually, I keep thinking it looks like a foundry  pattern for a large cast iron fire valve wheel. But no matter how it looks, it  certainly works much better around  lines than the open-spoked wheel.  
              Cable Run Mods 
              Speaking of the steering on the schooner, you may remember  the Byzantine complexity of my cable runs. When you want to have it all, you  pay a price. At the time I was willing to deal with an overcomplicated system  so I could have access to the port-side compartment from the rear cockpit.  
                
              This meant taking the cables straight forward from the  steering drum into the compartment,  then to the top of the compartment and across to the side where they emerged  again to run aft. Now I’m willing to accept fewer features for easier  maintenance.  
              What prompted this was the failure of a sheave inside the  compartment. Well, the sheave didn’t actually fail – my mounting did. It  allowed this non-pivoting sheave to twist a little, allowing the cable to run  off and jam between the sheave and cheek. While I was wedged under the thwart  with my head and one arm through a tiny hatch, I realized that I seldom  actually used that hatch. All I ever  reached in for were lifejackets that could be reached from the forward cockpit.  After I recovered from the contortions, I screwed it shut and moved all the  cables out of the compartment.  
                
              For what it’s worth, I think I could have gotten away  without that lower sheave if I’d placed the padeye a little higher. Either way,  this is so much easier set up and to maintain it’s ridiculous. Actually, it  highlights how ridiculous it was for me to insist on features I could do  without.  
              The Monkey Stick 
              Expedience led me to revisit the monkey stick. It is a  terrible line-catcher on a sailboat, but it works beautifully on a  powerboat.  My AF4B was pretty much ready  for Rend Lake 2008, but my motor lacked a tiller. (The funny part is that I got  a motor with a tiller after this was mostly set up. Isn’t that the way it  goes…) I suppose it would have been simpler to buy a tiller to fit the motor,  and use a tiller extension. But I don’t like having a cockpit-sweeping tiller  extension, since I’m nearly always out with at least three other people.  Fortunately the monkey stick is nearly as simple, which is why it used to be  pretty much standard on small boats that had remote steering.  
              The stock tiller gives a pretty good idea how much steering  power we’ll need. This motor has the center of the handle 16” from the center  of the pivot – its effective tiller length. (Overall length is 18” from the  pivot.) The end of the tiller moves through about 26”. As long as the head of  our stick moves at least that far to cover the motor’s full travel, we should  be OK for leverage. 
              Then we need to figure out how far the steering fitting on  the motor fitting moves. This is a simple matter of lining up a tape measure  with the fitting and then pivoting the motor. If you have a 1950s or 1960s OMC 10  or 18 horse motor, it’s probably 12”.  
              A quick scale drawing gets us close to the mark. I think a 36”  stick is good, since it’s comfortable for me both sitting and standing. You’ll  have to experiment to find the right height for you. The cables are most  convenient to mount at around 15-16” above the cockpit sole, since that’s about  the height of the motor’s cables. (Assuming the cockpit sole is the bottom of  the boat.) If we attach the cable to the stick at this point, the end of the  stick moves about 25”, which is perfect. 
                
              When I diagrammed the cable run I discovered a difficulty.  The standard fitting OMC made for steering the motor uses two sheaves. This  gives a 2:1 mechanical advantage and we need to move 18” of cable. Attaching  the cable to the stick in the same place means we now move the handle about  40”, which is way too much. So we also need sheaves on the stick to keep this a  1:1 ratio. This creates a rather complicated system, as seen below left.  
                
              One fitting, seven sheaves, four springs, and two completely  separate sides to the cable run. What a convoluted way to get a simple 1:1  ratio! What if we could simply attach a single set of springs to the motor’s  fitting? That system is shown to the right of the other one. This gets us down  to five sheaves, two springs and only one length of cable to adjust. I like the  simplicity, but we need to look at some mountings.  
              Mounting the springs to the motor is simple. We use OMC’s  adapter, but remove the sheaves and put on springs. OMC was clever enough to  provide split links to make this easy. I have seen these fittings, however,  with figure-eight closed links. If you have one of those, it is not hard to  disassemble the springs to install them. Or of course you could cut the links  off and put on any kind of split links. 
                
              Attaching the cable to the stick is not much harder. I  drilled a hole and ran the cable through it, then locked it in place with two  cable locks – one is the nice stainless kind from Duckworks, and the other is a  more-expensive galvanized wire rope fitting from West Marine. The wire rope  fitting is obviously not purpose built, and I got stuck using it solely due to  poor planning on my part, but both work. With either type, a washer keeps the  wood from getting chewed up. This cable clamp method seems secure enough, but  if there were any doubt I would run the cable through twice and take a couple  turns around the stick. So far no need. 
                
              The cable run is no different from what you’ll read in Max  Wawrzyniak’s book or articles, so I won’t belabor it here. The main difference  is that instead of a steering unit up front, we have only a single sheave. By  the way, if you have a console-mounted compass, consider how little metal this  puts near it compared to a wheel installation.  
              Let’s look at the brackets that hold this stick in place.  The stick itself is about 1.5” square and laminated from two layers of scrap 1x  pine. I used Thompson’s Water Seal for the finish, because it’s quick and I was  short on time. The brackets are self-explanatory, I think. Except be sure to  account for how far away from the side of the boat the cable naturally lies.  That’s the best place for the stick.  
                
              I coated both stick brackets with Thompson’s Water Seal as  well. I think this will be great for the top bracket, but I doubt the paint on  the bottom bracket will stick for long, since Thompson’s is basically wax. I  also coated the underside of the upper bracket with Vaseline to make it  difficult for wasps to build nests in this attractively sheltered structure. 
                
              This bottom bracket is probably not the best design. It is  simply a piece of 1x lumber with a T-nut fitted in back then screwed to the  chine with PL400. The stick is screwed to the T-nut with a bolt and a couple  washers. It would probably be better to double the outside of that joint with a  piece angle iron or wood. The axle bolt would be much stronger that way, but  you’d have screw holes to fill on the bottom of the boat, which I didn’t have  time to deal with before the Midwest Messabout. I’ll probably get to adding  that angle eventually, but in the meantime I’ll be sure not to kick it too hard.  I might also be a good idea to provide the bottom of the stick with some metal  side plates to prevent the end splitting out.  
              We still have to control throttle and shift. I attached the  remote control box is attached to the upper stick guide… 
                
              ...using T-nuts so it wouldn’t interfere with the stick. 
                
              In use, the monkey stick doesn’t look as showy as a wheel,  but it is every bit as handy. It is especially nice how little space it takes  up. I don’t think it would be too handy for a ski boat or any other kind of  acrobatics where you really need to have one hand on the steering and the other  on the throttle. But for low speed maneuvering it works fine to put the left  hand on the stick and keep the right on the shifter.  
                
                
              Rob Rohde-Szudy 
                Madison,   Wisconsin, USA 
              robrohdeszudy@yahoo.com   
             |